Skip to main content
VeyJetInfininova

Our approach

We don't hand out activity recommendations at random

The problem with most college consulting isn't that they do too little. It's that the order is backwards — pick a target school, then work out what to grind for it. We run it the other way: understand the child first, then judge what actually holds up for them.

One principle runs through all of it

Every judgment starts from who this student actually is, not from what selective schools are said to want. The first approach travels a long way. The second produces work that doesn't survive a single interview question.

Ten steps

The question each step answers, and what it produces

This isn't a corporate flowchart. Every step has a specific question attached, and if it can't be answered, you shouldn't move to the next one.

  1. 01

    Understand the student

    Chinese-speaking teamresponsible

    Who is this child, really?

    Student interview, family interview, and a clear picture of the present. What we want to know is how they learn, what they're curious about, and what conditions make them stick with something — not just the numbers on a transcript.

    What this step produces

    A student profile and a record of the family's goals

  2. 02

    Feasibility call

    North Americaresponsible

    Does the U.S. path suit this child?

    Weighing curriculum, grade trend, English ability, and the time and resources the family has, we judge whether this path holds up. If it doesn't, we say so.

    What this step produces

    A feasibility conclusion and the main risks

  3. 03

    Set the target

    North Americaresponsible

    Given real conditions, what's a reasonable target?

    Settle the direction and the tier. What's on the table here is tier and type, not a specific school list — a list before Grade 10 is meaningless.

    What this step produces

    Direction and target tier

  4. 04

    Gap analysis

    Shared

    Specifically, what stands between here and there?

    Break the gap apart: what's academic, what's experiential, what's a matter of ability. Then judge which gaps are worth closing and which cost so much to close that a different route makes more sense.

    What this step produces

    A gap list, ranked by priority

  5. 05

    Multi-year roadmap

    Shared

    In what order do the next few years happen?

    Break the target into concrete plans by year and phase, each with a defined output — not "keep working hard."

    What this step produces

    A phased roadmap

  6. 06

    Match resources

    Shared

    Where do the opportunities come from?

    Vetting and connecting courses, projects, competitions, research, summer programs and internships. We stand behind our criteria — why we recommended this one and not that one gets explained.

    What this step produces

    A resource list with the reasoning behind each

  7. 07

    Execute

    Chinese-speaking teamresponsible

    How does the plan actually get done?

    The Chinese-speaking team tracks milestones and progress, breaking long-range goals into what fits in a month. Problems surface early instead of showing up in December.

    What this step produces

    A record of execution tracking

  8. 08

    Periodic review

    Shared

    What's working, and what should stop?

    Scheduled reviews. If something has run six months without producing anything, it should be cut. Admitting that a line of effort isn't worth continuing is part of what we're responsible for.

    What this step produces

    Conclusions from each review

  9. 09

    Adjust

    North Americaresponsible

    The child changed. How does the route change?

    Grades, interests, direction and family circumstances all shift. When they do, we reassess — rather than gritting through a plan that's out of date.

    What this step produces

    A revised route

  10. 10

    Apply

    North Americaresponsible

    How do several years of work become an application that holds together?

    The application is the natural result of everything before it, not a sprint at the end. This stage is about organizing, choosing what to leave out, and expressing it — not manufacturing material on short notice.

    What this step produces

    The material base and strategy for applications

Comparison

How this differs from common practice

The left column isn't a straw man. These practices are common in the industry and they do win clients. We just don't think they help the student.

Common practice
How we do it
Pick a target school, then work backwards to what needs grinding
Understand the child, then judge what target is realistic
Every student does research, competitions and twenty activities
Work out which kind suits this child, then go deep on one or two lines
Deliver a plan and call it done
Review on a schedule and cut what isn't producing
Bring in a North American mentor in senior year to polish essays
North American practitioners weigh in on the decisive calls from the planning stage on
Manufacture certainty with admit rates, probabilities and scores
Predict nothing; be accountable for judgment, process and support

What does this look like applied to your child?

The first step is the Pathway Assessment — the first four steps (understand, feasibility, target, gap), delivered as a written report. After that, you're free to carry on by yourselves.

Book a pathway assessment
Book a pathway assessment