Skip to main content
VeyJetInfininova

Long-Term Guidance

Not a roadmap and goodbye — we stay through the execution

This tier isn't about handing you a thicker plan. It's about staying with the plan until it actually gets executed. For most families the problem was never not knowing what to do — it's that the effort scattered, drifted, or circumstances changed and nobody reassessed.

At a glance

Best for
Best entered in Grades 8–10 · Families who want someone managing the whole route long term
Duration
2–3 years
Fee
RMB 160,000–260,000reference price

Reference price. Actual scope depends on the student.

First, check the fit

Who this service is for

Buying the wrong tier wastes more than buying nothing. Read both columns side by side.

A good fit if

  • Best entered in Grades 8–10, when you want the next two to three years systematically managed
  • You've tried planning it yourselves and it fell apart halfway through
  • Your child's situation changes quickly and needs continuous reassessment
  • You want the substance in place before application season arrives

Consider a different tier if

  • You only want one year planned — the Annual Growth Plan is enough
  • You only need a one-time judgment — the Pathway Assessment is better value
  • You want the highest level of North American involvement and access — see the Full Program

What it solves

The questions it answers

We made a plan, but we can't execute it.

The Chinese-speaking team tracks milestones and progress, breaking long-range goals into what can actually be finished in a month.

Our child changed, circumstances changed — who reassesses?

Periodic review and live adjustment are the core of this tier, not an add-on.

We've done plenty of activities, but they don't add up to anything.

Narrow to a main line based on where the student's interest actually is, and pull scattered experiences into a story that can be told.

What's included

What you get

  • Multi-year roadmap with ongoing gap analysis
  • Course sequencing, GPA, AP/IB and testing schedule
  • Activity portfolio and competition strategy
  • Research direction and summer program vetting
  • Exploring intended majors
  • Periodic review, live adjustment, and handoff into application season

Deliverables

What you walk away with

  • A multi-year roadmap with phase goals
  • A cross-year course and testing track
  • Activity portfolio and main-line design
  • Competition strategy and research direction recommendations
  • Vetted resources and introductions
  • A written record of each periodic review
  • Revised plans as things change
  • The material base for application season

Process

How it runs, start to finish

Every step has a specific question to answer and something concrete to show for it — not a vague promise of "ongoing communication."

  1. 01

    Full baseline assessment

    A complete read on academics, ability, interests, existing experience and family resources.

  2. 02

    Multi-year roadmap

    Break two to three years into phase goals, each with a defined output.

  3. 03

    Course and testing track

    How rigor ramps across years, with AP/IB and testing scheduled around it.

  4. 04

    Designing the activity portfolio

    Set the main line and the secondary ones, and cut what isn't producing value.

  5. 05

    Competition and research direction

    Decide whether it suits the student, which kind suits them, and vet the specific opportunities.

  6. 06

    Match resources

    Vetting and connecting courses, projects, summer programs and opportunities.

  7. 07

    Ongoing execution tracking

    The Chinese-speaking team works the milestones, so problems surface early.

  8. 08

    Periodic review

    Scheduled reviews of what's working and what should stop.

  9. 09

    Adjust

    Reassess as things change and revise the route.

  10. 10

    Handoff to applications

    Organize several years of work into the raw material application season runs on.

North American involvement

What our North American practitioners do at this tier

North American practitioners stay involved on direction, activity value and research decisions.

Direction calls

Ongoing involvement in decisions about intended major and academic track.

Activities and research

Judging whether an activity or research direction is worth the investment.

Competition strategy

A read on which competitions to enter and how much to commit.

Periodic review

Involved in every phase review, with a professional read on any drift.

Timeline

Roughly how it paces out

The real pace adjusts to the student. What's below is a typical arrangement.

  1. Baseline and roadmap

    Months 1–2

    Complete the full assessment and design the multi-year route.

  2. Year one

    Months 3–14

    Build the base; the main line starts to take shape.

  3. Year two

    Months 15–26

    Take the main line deep and produce work that counts.

  4. Handoff to applications

    Final 3–6 months

    Organize the material and prepare to move into applications.

FAQ

About Long-Term Guidance

Not sure this is the right tier? Let's talk first.

The first conversation is free. We'll learn about your child, then tell you which tier fits — including when the answer is "you don't need the expensive one."

We promise no admissions outcome. What we take responsibility for is judgment, process management and professional support.

Explore long-term guidance